Don Jackson
Define a standard that enables HVAC systems to participate in demand flexibility, in order to:
Are there ANY native-VEN HVAC systems?
Are there ANY HVAC systems that support CTA-2045?
Virtually all AHRI 1380-2019 compliant HVAC systems do so via:
Local HEMS is the best location to translate price & DR events to functional-control commands
The HVAC system supports:
Fully capable of participating in demand flexibility with no additional cost or effort
Requires additional cost and effort to participate
Experience with CTA-2045 for water heaters has clearly demonstrated that the cost and installation of a UCM is too large, resulting in very poor connection rates. CTA-2045 is obsolete and should be EOL'd.
Two distinct compliance types — a system must support one, may support both:
Protocol(s) provided directly & locally by the HVAC system:
Protocol(s) provided via the manufacturer's cloud:
A compliant HVAC system must specify which option(s) it supports.
Enables existing products to comply while providing a clear transition path.
Native control of HVAC power & energy is the only way to support these use cases. HVAC manufacturers should focus on and prioritize native protocol support. OpenADR 3.1 supports BOTH cloud-to-cloud AND cloud-to-native use cases.
The CEC has begun a series of dockets to define Flexible Demand Appliance Standards (FDAS):
It behooves AHRI 1380 to support potential regulatory mandates and future rebate/incentive requirements.
The 1380-2026 proposals provide a smooth transition path from today to tomorrow, enabling HVAC systems to "skate to where the puck is going."
Most useful HVAC controls for DR:
Variable power adjustment via Matter DEM and DEM-mode clusters provides the most granular control. Local control is crucial for HEMS.